Wild honey bee colonies in ancient and veteran trees in South East England

Written by Francis L W Ratnieks and Oliver D Visick

The honey bee, Apis mellifera, has existed far longer than humans have been building hives to house them. Before hives were available, and still to this day, honey bees have built their nests in hollow trees and sometimes in other natural cavities, including in the ground, in rock crevices and occasionally not in any kind of cavity. They also commonly nest in cavities in buildings.

Swarms do not select cavities at random. A nest cavity is chosen via a remarkable process carried out by scout bees from a swarm which locate a number of nearby options and of these select a good one (Seeley 2010). They are choosy, rejecting those too small or large in volume, or with entrances that are very small or large. Although bee hives are generally kept at ground level, swarms prefer cavities high above ground.

Swarms can travel several kilometres to a new nest site. Worker bees in swarms have enlarged wax glands and quickly build combs and rear brood from eggs laid by the accompanying queen. The new colony is challenged to build its population and food stores before winter. Many fail. Colonies founded in spring have a higher mortality rate in the following winter than colonies established in previous years.

The Ancient Tree Inventory

The Ancient Tree Inventory (ATI) is a citizen science project started in 2004 by the Woodland Trust (a charity promoting trees and woodlands), the Ancient Tree Forum and the Tree Register of the British Isles. Anyone can register a tree meeting the relevant criteria: ancient and veteran, based on probable age and old-tree characteristics, or notable, such as a good specimen. The listing is then confirmed by an expert and made public. In mid-November 2023 the ATI web site noted that “already more than 190,000 trees [are] listed but there are thousands more to add”.

Trees on the ATI can be referred to as Trees of Special Interest or TSIs but in this article we also refer to them as ATI trees. The ATI is far from complete. Based on a recent study by Nolan et al (2022) with the descriptive title “Distribution models calibrated with independent field data predict 2 million ancient and veteran trees in England”, there are 2 million trees suitable for inclusion on the list in England alone, which is about 15 per square kilometre. Given that England is 53.5% of UK area, there could be 3.7 million such trees in the UK. 

Ancient trees, wildlife, cavities and honey bees

As noted by the Woodland Trust, ancient and veteran trees are a valuable resource for wildlife. Therefore, protecting ancient and veteran trees does more than help just trees and woodlands. As trees get older and larger, they accumulate features valuable to other species. These include cavities, bark with a wider range of textures and pockets where it is partly detached, bark-free areas, deadwood, root buttresses, ivy and other climbers, epiphytes including mosses and lichens, bracket fungi, insect galleries, and in tropical areas termite nests. (For more features see Kraus et al. 2016. Catalogue of tree microhabitats – Reference field list1)

Cavities, the feature honey bee colonies need, take a long time to develop. Only 1% of oak trees, Quercus robur, under 100 years old in southern Sweden had cavities, rising to 50% at 200–300 years and 100% at over 400 years (Ranius et al 2009).

Tree cavities have many causes including fungal decay, which can be promoted by physical damage including that by humans. Some result from excavation by primary nesting animals. The black woodpecker (Dryocopus martius) is Europe’s largest woodpecker, although not found in Britain. It excavates tree cavities commonly occupied by honey bees. However, at approximately 10 litres, these are not quite large enough to accommodate the bees and their winter honey stores. Britain has three woodpecker species. The largest is the green woodpecker (Picus viridis). It makes cavities of approximately 7 litres (15cm wide x 40cm deep). In a study of 21 wild honey bee colonies in New York State, all were in cavities over 10 litres (Seeley and Morse 1976). Research using bait hives showed than cavities of 40 litres were selected over 10 or 200 litres (Seeley and Morse 1978).

Although woodpecker cavities are on the small size, a larger than average cavity or one that has increased in size via decay or by connecting to another cavity, would be a viable home to a honey bee colony. Honey bee workers have small, blunt mandibles adapted for moulding wax but not excavation, so they cannot enlarge a cavity. Many insects, including wood-boring beetle, wood wasp and moth larvae, make tree cavities although these are far too small for honey bee colonies.

Nest entrance at 5.3m with workers clustered around, Mote Park, Kent
Ancient Tree Inventory tree in Richmond Park

LASI survey of ATI Trees

In 2021 and 2022 we surveyed 1052 trees on the ATI at 16 sites in South East England: in East Sussex, West Sussex, Kent, Surrey, and Greater London (Visick and Ratnieks 2023). These were mainly in landed estates with sufficient accessible trees to make surveying practical. Surveys were mainly in early spring, before leafing, to facilitate observing forager bee traffic at nest entrances. To find colonies, trees were scanned by eye and with the aid of binoculars on days and times suitable for foraging. To ensure that the traffic indicated a living colony, not just robbing or scouting, we confirmed that some bees had pollen in their baskets.

How many?

We found 22 honey bee colonies in the 1,052 trees, equivalent to an occupancy of 2% (noting that one tree had two colonies). This suggests that there could be 40,000 honey bee colonies living in ATI trees in England or 75,000 across the UK.

This estimate is based on an extrapolation from a relatively small survey in one part of the UK and should be used with caution. Perhaps interested beekeepers, bee and tree lovers, and naturalists will survey ATI trees in other regions.

The figure could be an overestimate. Maybe ATI trees in South East England have higher occupancy. However, the way in which we surveyed suggests that it may be an underestimate. For one thing, some wild colonies may not have been detected. More importantly, trees were mainly surveyed in early spring, after winter but before swarming. Many honey bee colonies die in winter and early spring with numbers building up in late spring and early summer via swarming. Most wild colonies that survive the winter will swarm, producing one prime swarm and possibly several after-swarms. If we reckon that each surviving colony, on average, makes one or two swarms, then surveys in summer would be expected to find two or three times as many wild colonies.

Of course, wild bee colonies do not only nest in ATI-quality trees. Many will be living in other trees as well as other cavities, particularly in buildings. Overall, this could be a substantial number. There are an estimated 288,000 managed hives in the UK. How many wild colonies are there? We do not know, but it is quite possible that the number of wild colonies is a high proportion, or even equals or exceeds those managed in hives. In another study we reviewed research on the density of wild honey bee colonies worldwide. The results indicate that wild colonies outnumber managed hives two- or three-fold, although in Europe hives outnumbered wild colonies (Visick and Ratnieks 2023). 

Locations where ancient tree inventory trees were surveyed for wild colony bee colonies

Other survey findings

Overall occupancy and other species

Nearly half, 481 of 1052 (45.7%), ATI trees surveyed had a cavity (ie, an opening could be seen). However, it was not possible to determine cavity volumes, and if they were sufficiently large for a honey bee colony. We could not measure the volumes of occupied cavities either. Only 4.4% of ATI trees with cavities had a honey bee colony.

Other species of cavity nesters seen were doves and pigeons, jackdaws, little owls, ring-necked parakeets, grey squirrels, and the European hornet, Vespa crabro, which is a native species. Ironically, most were introduced species (grey squirrels, ring-necked parakeets, little owls) or considered pests (pigeons and jackdaws).

Most (>90%) ATI trees with cavities appeared not to have cavity nesters. This suggests that nest site availability is not limiting cavity-nesting species and that competition for cavities is low. Unlike the UK human housing market, supply seems to exceed demand. Different species also have different requirements. Great tits nest in tree cavities, averaging approximately 4–8 litres, depending on tree species, in the Bialowieza forest in eastern Poland. Several other small birds nest in tree cavities (blue tit, marsh tit, collared flycatcher, pied flycatcher, nuthatch) smaller than those used by the great tit. All these species mainly use cavities far too small for a honey bee colony (Maziarz et al 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1169-6). Bird species that require larger cavities may accept cavities with entrances too large for honey bees. In other words, the cavity requirements of honey bee colonies and nesting birds are not the same.

The fact that most ATI trees did not have honey bee colonies despite having cavities suggests that nest cavity availability is not limiting wild honey bee colony numbers. There is currently a great deal of interest in helping bees and other forms of wildlife.

In the case of honey bees, this includes selling and putting up nest boxes/log hives and making cavities in trees. Our results suggest that doing so is not needed, although it may well be interesting to do. A better way of helping honey bees and flower-visiting insects in general would be to provide more summer-blooming flowers. 

Where on the trees were the colonies?

Across the 22 colonies in the ATI survey, plus an additional 16 that we found, making 38 in total, the most common location for a nest (15 colonies, 39%) was in the tree trunk with a further 24% in a co-dominant stem (effectively a type of trunk). However, 32% were in a branch and 5% at the base.

Entrance heights (36 colonies) ranged from 0 to 18.2m, averaging (median) 6.8m. This is in keeping with previous research using paired bait hives in New York State showing that swarms select 5m over 1m (Seeley and Morse 1978), but low cavities were also used (Seeley and Morse 1976). 

Bait hives in NY State with south-facing entrances were more often selected than north-facing ones (Seeley and Morse 1978). However, the entrances in the 36 colonies we studied had varied compass orientations. Wild colonies in NY State also had varied entrance orientations (Seeley and Morse 1976). Nest orientation may not be a key survival factor. Scout bees probably have more important cavity characteristics to prioritise, such as volume.

Entrance origin and size were recorded for 32 nest entrances. The most common were branch holes originating either from decay (n=11) or mechanical damage (n = 10) with visible physical damage to the area around the hole. Interestingly, 25% (8 nests) had entrances that were woodpecker-made or enhanced holes with recent excavation marks around the entrance. A few, three (9%), were at the base of the tree between buttresses.

Entrance size ranged from 2.2 to 322cm2 with an average (median) of 33.8cm2. Quite a large proportion of colonies, nine (28%), were living in cavities whose entrance areas fell outside what previous research indicates is the preferred or typical range of 10 to 60cm2.

Nest in base of tree in Knepp Estate                
Honey bee warning sign in Herstmonceux Castle Estate due to wild colonies living in sweet chestnut trees

Tree species and sizes

Significantly more likely to house a honey bee colony. Diameter at breast height ranged from 0.26 to 2.95m with a lower average (mean) in unoccupied (1.3m, 1030 trees) versus occupied trees (1.7m, 21 trees).

Maiden trees (those without signs of management such as cutting back, coppicing or pollarding) were more likely to have a colony (2.7% versus 2% overall). However, this difference was not quite statistically significant. 

The most common ATI tree genus in our survey was oak, Quercus, (65.3%, 687 trees). Next was sweet chestnut (Castanea, 8.2%), followed by beech (Fagus, 6.9%), ash (Fraxinus, 3.3%), pine (Pinus, 2.3%), maple/sycamore (Acer, 2.1%), lime (Tilia, 2.1%) and horse chestnut (Aesculus, 2.0%). These accounted for over 90% of the trees surveyed. Others were cedar (Cedrus), birch (Betula), hornbeam (Carpinus), yew (Taxus) and plane (Platanus).

Of the ten oak species in the survey, 89% of ATI trees were Q. robur, the more common of our two native oaks. Oaks had slightly fewer colonies, 1.5%, compared to 2% in the overall survey. However, this difference was not statistically significant. 

Sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa), a non-native tree species from southern Europe, had significantly more colonies than expected (7% occupancy versus 2% overall). However, it is unlikely that this species is intrinsically more attractive to swarms but probably because the sweet chestnuts were larger in diameter (mean: 1.6m versus 1.3m overall) and more often with cavities (73% versus 46% overall). Centuries ago, sweet chestnuts were often planted on landed estates and there are now many large trees, including dying and dead trees. In our study site at Herstmonceux Castle in East Sussex, for example, there is a line of very large sweet chestnuts near the café and beside public paths; some with colonies have signs alerting the public to their presence.  

Overall, wild honey bee colonies showed little preference among ATI and other bee-housing trees in terms of tree genus or form. These attributes did not help explain colony occupancy. What seems to count is diameter. Diameter almost certainly correlates with age and, as shown in the study of oaks in Sweden, older trees are more likely to have cavities.  

Do colonies in UK tree cavities survive?

A study in Germany of wild honey bee colonies living in beech tree cavities, mainly made by black woodpeckers, found that most, 84%, died the next winter (Kohl et al 2022). This suggests that most were ephemeral, founded by swarms one spring but not surviving to the next spring. Swarms may have come from nearby managed beehives or wild nests in high-quality cavities or locations that permitted high survival. As noted, black woodpeckers make cavities of only 10 litres on average, too small for honey bee colonies living in northern areas to survive the winter. In addition, beech woods are unlikely to be good foraging territory.

Were our wild colonies similar, being mainly temporary and founded by swarms from nearby managed hives? It is sometimes suggested that in the UK wild honey bee colonies are just a result of swarms from managed hives. However, this cannot be the case for all of our colonies. Most were surveyed after winter before the swarming season, so had already survived the winter. Most were not in tree cavities made by woodpeckers. We are making a long-term study of our wild colonies to determine survival rates. Preliminary data from the first three years indicate that annual survival is approximately 45% with most mortality over winter, as expected. Given that surviving colonies normally make one or more swarms, this would be sufficient to sustain colony numbers. 

Conclusion

The Woodland Trust’s Ancient Tree Inventory has proved an invaluable means for locating trees. The results of our survey confirm that ancient and veteran trees are important to wildlife, in this case the honey bee, Apis mellifera, which is a native British species. It does not seem to matter which species the tree is. What matters is that there are cavities. In our study we confirm that ATI trees frequently have cavities, and that these are home to honey bee colonies as well as hornet colonies and nest sites for various birds and the grey squirrel. We probably missed some other species. Most cavities are not occupied, suggesting that there is little competition among cavity-nesting species.

Overall, there appears to be a large and biologically significant number of honey bee colonies living in ATI trees, quite possibly as many as 25% or even 50% the number of managed UK hives.

Our study was carried out in South East England. Further surveying to determine the use of ATI trees in other parts of the UK would be worthwhile. Our study found cavities in 44% of ATI trees, as shown by the presence of an entrance hole. But we were not able to determine the volume of these cavities or of the occupied cavities. Do readers have ideas about how to do this? In a recent study we made on cork oaks in Andalusia, Spain, we inserted wires into cavities to measure depth and width. This was relatively easy to do as the cavities were empty, without honey bee colonies, and close to the ground. It would not be so easy to do for the occupied cavities we studied in South East England where the honey bee colonies we found were as high as 18.2m and averaged 6.8m.

Main references

Visick OD, Ratnieks FLW (2023). Ancient, veteran and other listed trees as nest sites for wild honey bee, Apis mellifera, colonies. Journal of Insect Conservation https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-023-00530-7 This article is open access. The other references cited in the text are listed at the end of this article, as are many other relevant articles and books.1 https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1500.6483

Ancient Tree Inventory (ATI): ati.woodlandtrust.org.uk

Acknowledgement: The project on which this article is based forms part of Ollie Visick’s PhD which is kindly funded by the CB Dennis British Beekeepers’ Research Trust.

Francis L W Ratnieks and Oliver D Visick, Laboratory of Apiculture & Social Insects (LASI) School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.  [email protected]    [email protected]

Francis L W Ratnieks and Oliver D Visick

Laboratory of Apiculture & Social Insects (LASI) School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
[email protected]
[email protected]

Want to read more?

Submit your article to BeeCraft to feature in our magazine

We always welcome new contributors to the magazine.

Please email your article or ideas to the editorial team.
We will work with you to produce an article you can be proud of.

Enjoy this content and more

Discover the UK’s best-selling monthly beekeeping magazine to read the latest apiculture news, research and features from around the world.

Cart

Your Cart is Empty

Back To Shop